| |

UA’s Involvement With Water Broadens
With Two New Academic Programs
Water is an emphais in two new University of Arizona programs. One of
the programs provides graduate students and working professionals the
opportunity to earn a certificate in water policy. The other is a collaborative
effort combining the concepts of law and economics to better understand
environmental issues
Certificate in Water Policy Offered
Graduate students and working water
professionals wanting to broaden and enhance their water policy expertise
will be able to enroll in the recently approved University of Arizona’s
Graduate Certificate in Water Policy. Earning the certificate requires
taking 12 units or four UA graduate courses. Scheduling flexibility is
a key to the program, with students able to complete work from one semester
to two years. This is to accommodate the different schedules of graduate
students and working professionals, the two groups served by the program.
The way it now works is that UA graduate students interested in water
issues pursue traditional academic degrees in various UA programs including
environmental sciences, social sciences, engineering and law, each program
offering a particular focus on water.
Carl Bauer, Water Resources Research Center associate director and certificate
program director, says some of these students might want more exposure
to water policy. “They might want to round out and deepen their
understanding of policy to complement their work in some more established
fields.”
The interdisciplinary certificate program will provide a water policy
grounding to students in these varied disciplines.
Also targeted as students for the policy certificate are working, on-the-job
water professionals. Bauer says, “These are people working in the
world who have at least a bachelor’s degree and maybe more but want
the opportunity to get deeper into policy issues.”
He says, “Many water managers have scientific or engineering backgrounds
without the academic work in policy-related studies. They now deal with
policy because of their professional activities. Some realize they need
more training in the policy area.”
Certificate scheduling has been arranged to accommodate working professionals’
on-the-job commitments. The four-course certificate program can be completed
in one semester during a short professional sabbatical or courses could
be taken over time to fit educational release programs in government and
industry. Organizations could use the certificate as a way to provide
on-the-job training and educational opportunities to promote career growth.
UA units and departments offering certificate course work include the
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, College of Law, Department
of Geography and Regional Development, School of Public Administration
and Policy, and Department of Soil, Water and Environmental Science.
Bauer says the certificate program is helping fill a UA need for water
policy or water management instruction. He says, “The UA does not
currently offer a water policy or water management degree. We have a lot
of faculty expertise in these areas and interested students can find classes
in various departments around campus, but there is not a degree that brings
this together and says ‘water policy’ in the title.”
Bauer says the water policy certificate may be the first step toward establishing
such a degree. He says, “The university is moving in the direction
of a more structured program to strengthen and consolidate water management
and policy as a major area of expertise. This is a first step. It will
help to institutionalize our expertise in the policy and social science
aspects of water. ”
The water policy certificate program has been approved effective this
summer to begin operating in the fall.
Program Applies Both Law and Economics
to Study of Environmental Issues
Environmental and natural resource
studies often rely on the disciplines of economics and law to explain
varied and complex issues. The limitation of this traditional approach
is that two views are offered: the law view and the economic view. A new
University of Arizona program is breaking new ground with a collaborative,
interdisciplinary approach to the study of environmental issues that draws
upon the insights provided by both legal theory and economic analysis.
Called Economics, Law and the Environment, the research and education
program is a joint venture between the James E. Rogers College of Law
and the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics in the College
of Agriculture and Life Sciences. ELE co-directors are Kirsten H. Engel,
UA professor of law and Dean Lueck, Bartley P. Cardon Professor of Agricultural
and Resource Economics and also a professor of economics and of law.
Engel says, “The ELE program is the first formal collaborative program
between law and economics in the nation which focuses on environmental
issues.”
She says law and economics offer complementary approaches to understanding
natural resource issues. Laws are applied to manage the environment; economics
determines whether resources are being managed in the best interest of
society.
ELE has been founded with high expectations that the program will gain
recognition as a national center for the combined study of economics,
law and the environment. Lueck says, “We intend to not only bring
in first-rate scholars to visit the UA and present their work, but also
to attract and encourage the best students.”
ELE program directors hope eventually to provide funding to support faculty
research. Plans also call for establishing an annual lecture series as
well as providing stipends to support student research. Engel says this
is in the future when funding is available.
Engel and Lueck also look forward to ELE offering more courses bringing
together the disciplines of law and economics to study environmental and
natural resource issues. Engel says, “We would like to offer more
courses in the future but right now we are offering them under the auspices
of either department.”
Water figures prominently as one of the environmental and natural resource
issues of concern to ELE. Along with expertise in water economics and
water law, faculty affiliated with ELE have backgrounds in the economics
of natural resources and the law of natural resources, land use economics
and land use law, the economics of property and property law, the law
and economics of environmental regulation, biodiversity, sustainability,
federalism and risk management.
ELE will be sponsoring a workshop each spring. The workshop this spring
featured five nationally known scholars presenting works-in-progress that
applied economic approaches to environmental problems and natural resource
issues. Conducted as a seminar, the workshop was attended by law and AREC
students along with ELE-affiliated faculty members.
Upcoming events include a symposium on October 26 on “Property Rights
in Environmental Assets: Economic and Legal Perspectives,” to be
held at the Arizona State Museum on the UA campus.
For additional information about the ELE Program check its web site: www.ele.arizona.edu
Public Participation Serves Varied
Political Goals
Among the various factors to consider when making water-related decisions
is public participation. Varady says, “In this country it would
be the kiss of death to design a water process without allowing the public
to have a voice.” He says public participation traveled a roundabout
political circuit to get to where it is today. At first more or less driven
by liberal concerns, public participation was a populist notion to involve
people in making decisions affecting their livelihoods and lives. Those
on the political right later embraced public participation as a strategy
to advance states’ rights as one way to “get government off
people’s backs.” In such a view, public participation was
appropriated as a way for local residents to take control without interference
from Washington or even Phoenix. But while both the right and left may
advocate a larger role for the public, citizen involvement in decisions
affecting their own watersheds, to take one example, also can serve as
a way to bridge opposing ideologies.

|
|