
A Sierra Vista/Cochise County Water Authority Needed to Meet Sustainability Mandate
Legislation In Works to Create Upper San Pedro Water District
Tom Buschatzke, Water Advisor for City of Phoenix, contributed this Guest View. He can be reached at: tom.buschatzke@phoenix.gov
CenCarol Sanger, Executive Director, Upper San Pedro Partnership, contributed this Guest View.
The residents of the Sierra Vista Subwatershed have a difficult challenge
— achieve sustainability in the Sierra Vista Sub watershed by September
2011 or lose their economic engine, Fort Huachuca, and very likely the
beautiful, San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area (SPRNCA). This
is because the residents are ultimately responsible for meeting the 2011
deadline affirmed by Congress in the Defense Authorization Act in 2004.
In 1998, a core group of organizations and agencies created the Upper
San Pedro Partnership, binding themselves to “assist in meeting
the water needs in the Sierra Vista Subwatershed...” From this,
a 21-member consortium emerged, one that has been successful in securing
federal funding to inform itself and others about the scientific nature
of the problem so that member agencies might undertake appropriate management
measures, develop reuse and recharge options, and reduce groundwater pumping.
The Partnership has many accomplishments to its credit. It has identified
sensitive hydrologic locations appropriate for recharge and protection
from development. Collaboration with U.S. Geological Survey and the University
of Arizona’s SAHRA Institute has resulted in a state-of-the-art
groundwater model and a companion user-interface Decision Support System.
Dry wells, detention basins, toilet rebate programs, business conservation
grants and Water Wise, the conservation outreach effort of the UA’s
Cooperative Extension, are examples of ongoing Partnership programs.
A current project will reduce groundwater pumping by over 500 acre-feet
per year through the transfer of treated effluent from Bisbee to water
a golf course in Naco. In the fall, Huachuca City will start work on its
wastewater ponds, building a pipeline to Fort Huachuca so that its treated
effluent can be reused or recharged. The Partnership has developed a model
water conservation ordinance, supported the County’s Water Overlay
District that requires a high level of water conservation in new development.
Since 2002, these efforts have reduced the deficit in water budget terms
by over 60 percent but they are not enough. Sustainability can only be
achieved by moving water around within the basin or by importing it from
outside. Remaining project options are large and complex and cannot be
achieved within the current levels of delegated authority by the state.
In 2005, the Partnership entered into an agreement with the U.S. Bureau
of Reclamation to conduct an appraisal level study of 12 augmentation
alternatives. After many months of meetings, the Partnership accepted
its work group’s recommendation of three preferred alternatives.
These are: capturing stormwater for reuse and/or recharge in an urbanized
area of Sierra Vista; dewatering Bisbee’s Copper Queen Mine, treating
and transporting the water to recharge or reuse near the SPRNCA; and seeking
a Central Arizona Project allocation when the distribution is re-opened
for negotiation which would require an extension of CAP from its terminus
in Tucson into Cochise County.
Apart from the obvious cost, complexity and political sensitivity of these
options, neither the City of Sierra Vista nor Cochise County has the authority
to develop, own or operate this kind of infrastructure. This is the urgent
issue that the Upper San Pedro Water District legislation seeks to address.
The issue of local water management authority has been identified in the
Partnership’s annual report to Congress as a known legal impediment
since 2004. It is widely recognized by civic leaders that without authority
to develop and maintain water infrastructure, the congressionally mandated
goal of sustainability cannot be achieved by 2011 and the loss of Fort
Huachuca and the SPRNCA are likely.
At this writing it is too early to predict the chances for passage of
this legislation, or what changes may be negotiated to create the district.
If the Upper San Pedro Water District is established this legislative
session, then what will be its relationship with the Partnership? How
will it build on our tradition of using the best available science to
inform decision making? There are many unknowns.
As the bill works its way through the legislative process, the Partnership
stays focused on the goal of achieving sustainability in the subwatershed.
We have not lost sight of the SPRNCA and how urgent it is to keep the
San Pedro River wet. With over 350 species of birds nesting, migrating
and wintering in the region, the
SPRNCA has hemispheric importance. Nor have we lost sight of the economic
impact of Fort Huachuca — $1 billion locally, $2 billion statewide.
Our verification and monitoring activities continue. We are pursing opportunities
for conservation easements, supporting action by member agencies on conservation
ordinances and overlay districts, and working hard to increase resources
for residential and local business conservation programs.
2011 is only 42 months away!